Republicans of this era are about half-Right [no pun intended]. Their hatred of Clinton blinds them to his good points just as dislike [not quite hatred] of Bush dominates Democrat thinking. I saw Clinton as a brilliant man, a Rhodes Scholar is by definition a cut above the ordinary, with a serious dislocation of reality where the Office and his personal actions were concerned, i.e., the man was so stupid he could not understand there can be no personal secrets in Washington? I see Bush as an empty suit waiting for his successor; however, if he survives Iraq, he can be re-elected.

How do you think this paragraph is slanted? For or against whom? Or is it an equal distaste for both?